Tag Archives: history

Why I Refuse To Be Ashamed of Being White or Apologise For History

 

Both my parents were alcoholics. I don’t expect sympathy when I am just stating a fact. Growing up as the child of the town drunks I know what it was like to be the target of scorn and contempt because of someone elses actions.

‘ Everybody knows you Dad’s a drunk’

‘ I saw your mum on her way home, she’d get there quicker if she didn’t stagger so much’

‘ I bet you house stinks of beer’

‘ Did your parents put milk in your bottle as baby or did they give you beer?’

I also know what it is like to be blamed for the actions of others, my parents and others making it clear their drinking was my fault.

It took many years of therapy and self help to undo the damage of a childhood being held responsible for something I had no control over and the problems I was somehow supposed to fix. Eventually I was able to come to terms with the truth that it wasn’t my problem, my fault or my place to fix it and no one should have laid those burdens on me to begin with.

Just like my parents alcoholism being white is not my fault. It is not something I did on purpose to annoy or offend and it doesn’t make me responsible for the behaviour or complicit in ,by our modern standards, the disturbing attitudes and bad behaviour of white people past or present. Nor does the colour of my skin mean I automatically condone the aforementioned disturbing attitudes and bad behaviours past or present.

It has been the fashion for a long while now to accuse anyone who is white of being racist, as if it comes as a standard feature and not an optional extra with all white models. If you look at what racism really is, not the screaming left wing version, it’s a belief in the superiority of one race over others based on prejudice and bigotry. In other words, I think I’m better than you because of my preconceived ideas of who you are, what you are, how you act and what you believe and my obstinate adherance to those beliefs. Accusing someone of being a racist simply because they are white is a pretty racist thing to do.

Some time ago we were sat in church and the discussion turned to the treatment of indigenous people a countries like Canada and Australia by the European settlers. At one point on of the people declared

‘We really are horrible people aren’t we’ and while others nodded in agreement I spoke up

‘No, we aren’t. We didn’t do those things and we may very well have been the people who spoke out against the principle of Terra Nullius in Australia or the policy removing children from their families to residential schools. Just like we may very well have been abolitionist who campaigned against the slave trade’

It took people by surprise, the idea that we aren’t guilty of what we didn’t do.

History is not an exact science with definitive answers. Though a more rigorous attitude should be applied to gathering facts and information regarding history, it’s recording and reporting and understanding the influence of the bias of the person doing the gathering and recording has, what sources they use, primary and secondary, and what sources they discard, what information is missing, it often isn’t. We need to be aware of this just as we need to understand how a person, including ourself, understands and internalizes what someone else has written about a historical event influenced by their personal bias. History is written not just the victors but also the people who value their lives and livelihoods, consider Shakespeare writing Richard III during the reign of the granddaughter of HenryVII.

There are so many questions that need to be asked when considering the why and wherefore surrounding a moment in or a person from the past like the prevalent attitudes of the people involved and the social and economic factors behind an event. Nothing and no one from history is isolated from what has gone before or is happening then. The only constant a history is there are rarely out and out good guys and bad guys.

People who work to the agenda that white people were always the bad guys and people of colour always the victims ignore the many subtle and not so subtle nuances of history based on facts. White people were enslaved as well as the enslavers in the new world. White people were sent by white people to Australia as punishment, many lived enslaved lives and died there. In Africa indigenous people captured and sold people from other tribes into the transatlantic and Arab slave trades and kept slaves themselves. Slavery was practiced by native people throughout the Americas long before Europeans arrived. Discrimination and bigotry was not a new concept taught to indigenous people by the Europeans.

The inconvenient truth is white people started and supported the Abolitionist Movement, white people helped freed slaves make their voices heard. In 1808, following the abolition of the slave trade in the Empire, the British Navy formed the West Africa Squadron tasked with enforcing the ban on the slave trade based in Free Town, Sierra Leone. In 1862 the Lincoln administration granted full permission to the British navy to intercept American ships. Also in America white people were conductors and station masters on the Underground Railroad one of the earliest being 15 year old Levi Coffin in 1813. History isn’t like the old Western movies where you can tell the good guys from the bad guys by the colour of their hats.

Slavery is alive and well today with people of all colours, ethnic backgrounds, nationalities and religious persuasions if not taking part then turning a blind eye to out right condoning it. At the same time people of all colours, ethnic backgrounds, nationalities and religious persuasions have joined in the battle to end modern day slavery,rescue and give safe harbour to it’s victims and prosecute those who profit from the practice.

No one is 100% virtuous, no one is 100% wicked, no one ever was or ever will be. Good people have and will continue to do bad things and bad people have and will continue to do good things. What we consider right and wrong in the 21st century is very different to what was acceptable in the 20th let alone in the centuries stretching back to when slavery was considered acceptable. Would I have supported the enslavement of people if I lived in 17th through 19thth century Britain? I don’t know, maybe I would have, maybe I would have joined the Abolitionist movements, maybe I wouldn’t have cared much as I strove to keep body and soul together. I suspect knowing a small bit of my familial history, especially the Scottish side, I would more than likely have been a candidate for selling into slavery/indentured servitude in the new world or possibly transportation to an Australian penal colony.

I am not a racist, I don’t look at a person and automatically assume I know what they think, believe or how they will act based on the colour of their skin, their features, the name they are known by mainly because I know how it feels to be judged in this way and treated in a negative way based on another person’s lazy stupidity.

I am not responsible for the actions of others now and I am certainly not going to be held accountable for the actions of the long dead just because a racist thinks my being white means I should be.

THOSE PEOPLE 2

THE ANTI

The ‘anti’ is the ultimate Single Issue Fanatic (SIF), aside from a stray lapel badge or emblazoned t-shirt there are rarely any obvious signs you are about to be cornered by an anti until they are in full flow. Antis have no interests outside of and no topic of conversation besides whatever cause they find their identity from and hold close to their heart. Causes which include but are not restricted to;
abortion
contraception
children:-having,feeding,training,schooling,hands on,hands off  yadda yadda blah blah
being childfree
pets
science
technology
immunisation and vaccination
(animal as well as human)
western medicine
eastern philosophy
Muslims
Jews
Christians
non Christians
God
organised worship
people;
men
women
gay
straight
transgender
of colour, any colour
white
mixed race including relationships from plutonic to romantic
politically left
politically right
liberals
urban people
rural people
farms, farmers and farming
field sports from ferreting and fishing to hunting and stalking
fireworks
cars
money
big business
globalisation
capitalism
communism
government
eating meat
consuming dairy
alcohol
vaping

It doesn’t matter what cause an anti holds dear to their heart there are certain mindsets and behaviours they all seem to share.
Antis don’t like and refuse to accept the world as it is and want to reshape it and they think it should be. This is a scary proposition because antis often sound and behave like teenagers, very spoilt and entitled teenagers.
Antis establish their identity in part if not in total on whatever they are against. They lack the self awareness and introspection necessary to see themselves as an individual not dependant on being part of a group for who they are. Antis will always remind you that they are part of a gang and their gang is bigger and tougher than your gang.
The anti functions in ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ bubbles. Us are the people who agree wholeheartedly, 100% without reservation with the cause, what it means, who’s to blame and how it should be dealt with. Them is anyone else and if you don’t immediately agree with them and their stance you become one of Them, a person to be viewed with suspicion and treated like an enemy of the cause.
Antis don’t do social awareness, they haven’t figured out how to react and modify their behaviour and interactions to produce a good result. Social skills are a mystery to antis who seem to think being loud and abusive is the way to bully people into thinking like them. They certainly don’t do listening.
Antis are always right, completely, totally and unequivocally right, just ask an anti and they will tell you how right they are and how wrong you are.
Antis claim to be politically aware but on closer inspection you realise they think being loud and opinionated is the same as having an understanding of how public policy and agendas are put together, how decisions are reached and put into action. Their understanding of how politics is presented and reported, political bias and the use of propaganda is rudimentary at best.
Added to all this is a Jeremy Kyle interpretation of how one expresses their passion. While most of us progress through our emotions on a topic rather like the family Ford being driven by Dad working our way up through the gears till we reach a reasonable speed the anti goes from 0 to raging like a flappy paddle Ferrari being driven by a boy racer. In anti world if you aren’t yelling, screaming almost rolling your eyes and foaming at the mouth then you obviously don’t care.
If you don’t immediately agree with and support the anti and what they believe to be true, becoming one of them, the first response is to assume you are ignorant about ‘the truth’. You will then be presented with ‘the facts’ You will also be interrogated about why you think differently and why you are so resistant to what is so blindingly obvious to them.
Anti arguments and supporting evidence relies heavily on repetition, rhetoric and hyperbole mainly because closer examination reveals just how little substance there is to these facts and how the information has been manipulated being out of date, out of context and often out and out lies. Since you are one of Them the anti has no problem refusing to consider you may have a point even when you are demonstrating how the material they rely upon and leaders they listen to are incorrect, inaccurate and misrepresenting information.
If you contradict the anti and what they believe, especially if you present evidence to the contrary or show the flaw in their argument, you will be judged ill informed, not understanding the gravity of the situation, lied to, lying to yourself, just plain stupid, some or all of the above.
It goes without saying that everything an anti says and everything they base what they stand for on is completely and totally true and anything to the contrary is false. The only sin worse than disagreeing is not caring. It’s at this point that interacting with an anti moves to anything from uncomfortable, we’ve all tried being polite while moving away, to angry to down right scary.
Antis agree with everything one of ‘Us’ does or says up to and including threats and acts of violence. Their lack of social skills and empathy means they have no problem hurling abuse and insults, making threats of violence and even launching physical attacks against people and property. Those who don’t take part will happily condone, defend and justify the actions of others often resorting to victim blaming because if ‘they would just stop doing what we are against we wouldn’t have to resort to the things we do.’
Most of all antis can not recognise the contradictions and hypocrisies of what they believe, what they stand for and what they do; Anti vaxxers saying they are protecting their children from harm by putting their children at risk because they refuse to accept that Andrew Wakefield’s research and resulting paper were seriously flawed not to mention funded by lawyers hoping to sue the manufacturers of vaccines, recently the vegan anti dairy protestors who describe themselves as peaceful but have threatened farmers and their families including kidnapping children and torturing them to death, the anti government protestors who you’ll never see turning down NHS health care.
For the anti only two things matter, the cause they have invested themselves in and being right even if it means sacrificing honesty, integrity and logic.